FROM THE LITERATURE
BRCAness Profile in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Predictive for Response to Platinum and PARP inhibitors
BRCA1/2 germline mutations in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) render tumor cells deficient in the homologous recombination (HR) DNA-repair pathway and make them more sensitive to platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors, a new targeted therapy that has shown impressive results in patients with BRCA-positive advanced EOC.
Although only about 10% to 15% of women with EOC carry these germ-line mutations, it appears that up to one-third of all sporadic EOC may be deficient in HR as a result of both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, and this is referred to as the “BRCAness” phenotype. These tumors may behave similarly to tumors with BRCA mutations.
Konstantinopoulos and colleagues attempted to identify a gene expression profile of "BRCAness" that correlates with responsiveness to platinum and PARP inhibitors. For development of the gene expression profile they used a publicly available microarray data set that included tumor expression data from 61 patients with pathologically confirmed EOC, including 34 with BRCA1/2 germline mutations and 27 without mutations (ie, sporadic cancers). They used genome-wide hierarchical clustering to define BRCA-like (BL) and non–BRCA-like (NBL) tumors. Based on these results they developed a 60-gene signature for BRCAness in familial and sporadic EOC. The authors tested the validity of this gene-expression profile by several methods and showed that the BRCAness profile accurately predicted platinum sensitivity and BRCA mutation status and was able to track development of platinum resistance. In addition, the BRCAness profile in vitro could distinguish between PARP-inhibitor–sensitive and PARP-inhibitor–resistant BRCA2 mutated pancreatic cancer cell line (Capan-1) clones.
Finally, the investigators tested tumor samples from 70 patients with sporadic EOC to evaluate whether the BRCAness profile correlated with clinical outcome. They found that the BRCAness profile was associated with predominantly high-grade serous tumors and with significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS; 34 months vs 15 months; P = .013) and OS (72 months vs 41 months; P = .006) compared to patients with a non-BRCAness profile. BRCAness profile remained an independent predictor of DFS and OS in multivariate analysis. Although these preliminary tests suggest that this gene signature could be a useful biomarker of BRCAness, prospective validation in patients treated with PARP inhibitors will be the true test of whether the BRCAness signature can predict responsiveness of PARP inhibitors and usher in a new era of molecularly targeted therapy for EOC.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 June 14. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5719 (article)
J Clin Oncol. 2010 June 14. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5791 (editorial)
G-CSF Support and Risk of AML/MDS
Growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is commonly used in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy to reduce the risk of neutropenic complications and the necessity for dose reductions and delays. Administration of G-CSF is also used to enable the safe delivery of dose-intense chemotherapy regimens. However, concerns have been raised that use of G-CSF may increase the risk of developing acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and/or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This debate prompted Lyman and colleagues to conduct a metaanalysis of 25 randomized, controlled trials in which 12,804 patients were randomly assigned to initial G-CSF support or not. The outcomes of this analysis showed that use of G-CSF in patients receiving chemotherapy increased both chemotherapy dose intensity and the risk of developing AML/MDS (relative risk = 1.92; P = .007 and absolute risk = 0.41%; P = .009) but decreased all-cause mortality (relative risk = 0.897; P<.001). These results suggest that increasing chemotherapy dose intensity may increase its leukemogenic potential, but the authors point out that the analysis cannot rule out the possibility that G-CSF itself may contribute to the increased risk of secondary malignancies. However, use of G-CSF appears to improve OS as a result of either improved disease control or by preventing early deaths due to hematologic toxicity.
J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(17):2914-2924.
Can Biomarkers Predict DCIS Behavior?
Although ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a relatively common diagnosis, there are currently no validated methods to predict the risk of subsequent invasive cancer for women diagnosed with DCIS. It is estimated that 5% to 10% of women with DCIS treated with lumpectomy alone develop a subsequent invasive breast cancer within 5 years, and another 5% to 10% develop a subsequent DCIS.
To identify clinical, histopathologic, and molecular characteristics of initial DCIS lesions that might distinguish patients with a low risk versus a high risk of developing subsequent invasive breast cancer, Kerlikowske and colleagues conducted a case-controlled, retrospective study in a cohort of 1162 women who were diagnosed with DCIS and treated by lumpectomy alone from 1983 to 1994. Pathology review of initial paraffin-embedded DCIS tissue and immunohistochemistry to determine biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, p53, p16, and cyclooxygenase-2 [COX2]) in a subset of the reviewed cases was performed. Of the 1162 women, 324 women developed a subsequent breast tumor in the ipsilateral breast (170 invasive cancer and 154 DCIS) during median follow-up of 8.2 years. Interestingly, factors associated with subsequent invasive cancer differed from those associated with subsequent DCIS. Multivariable analyses competing factors with univariate statistical significance confirmed that DCIS lesions that were p16+COX-2+Ki67+ or detected by palpation were associated with a significantly higher risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer; whereas classic histopathologic features, such as nuclear grade, were not able to distinguish high-risk disease. In contrast, factors that were independently associated with subsequent DCIS included positive or uncertain margins, DCIS lesions that were p16+COX-2-Ki67+, and those that were ER-HER2+Ki67+. The authors concluded that biomarkers, not histopathology, hold the key to identifying which tumors are associated with a high risk of progressing to invasive breast cancer and in need of immediate treatment.
In an accompanying editorial, Craig Allred noted that this is a thought-provoking study that addresses an important issue, but these data are not practice changing and require independent validation. He highlighted that, currently, DCIS is rarely treated with lumpectomy alone, as in this study, and it will be critical to determine whether the results of this study would have been influenced by adjuvant radiation and hormonal therapy.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):627-637.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):585-597.
Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy: A New Standard of Care?
The randomized phase III TARGIT-A (TARGeted Intraoperative RadioTherapy-A) trial reported by Vaidya et al showed that a single dose of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy was noninferior to standard whole-breast external-beam radiotherapy in women older than 45 years with invasive ductal breast carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery. The primary outcome was local recurrence in the conserved breast. Among 2021 women, there were only 6 local recurrences in the intraoperative radiotherapy group and 5 in the external beam radiotherapy group (1.20% versus 0.95%, respectively; P = .41) at 4 years. In addition, targeted intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with significantly less Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 3 toxicity (0.5% vs 2.1%; P = .002).
In the accompanying editorial, Azria and Bourgier commented that this technique is appropriate in selected patients, and they support the recommendations of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology task force proposing that intraoperative accelerated partial-breast irradiation is appropriate for women age ≥60 years with estrogen receptor–positive, T1N0, invasive ductal carcinoma and tumor size ≤1 cm. Indeed, these selection criteria are consistent with the population of patients enrolled in the TARGIT-A trial. One of the great advantages of this approach is that treatment is completed for the majority of patients at the time of surgery. Unless there is an indication for additional radiotherapy based on pathology (eg, lobular carcinoma) or other reasons, patients do not need to return to the clinic for up to 5 weeks of daily fractionated radiotherapy. This could greatly cut cost and improve convenience.
Lancet. 2010;376(9735):91-102.
|